Demo organisation · synthetic AP records

Live evidence · public Hedera Testnet facts only · no real funds

Evidence & audit

Live public Hedera facts are kept separate from the illustrative control trace. The current browser scenario is not a durable audit export.

Live x402 transport/payment spike

Exact public ledger facts, independently read from Mirror Node.

Consensus success
Service payment
1000000 tinybar (0.01 HBAR)
Route
0.0.97083550.0.9758583
Facilitator / transaction payer
0.0.9758618
Facilitator network fee
282113 tinybar
Consensus timestamp
1785026114.100875266
Evidence boundary: this proves a three-party HBAR transfer used by the live x402 spike. The transaction has an empty memo, its run note uses a 0x-prefixed digest, and the gate script is absent from this repository. It does not prove that the committed hardened adapter executed a canonical Remit AP action.

Live HTS lifecycle marker experiment

One no-value NFT serial, held only by the treasury.

Lifecycle verified
Type
NON_FUNGIBLE_UNIQUE
Treasury / only holder before burn
0.0.9708355
Current state
Serial 1 deleted · total supply 0 · supply key remains
Mint serial 1 to treasury
0.0.9708355-1785024779-021457816
Burn serial 1 from treasury
0.0.9708355-1785024788-043989723
Deleted NFT Mirror record
exact marker metadata

Experimental marker digest: 0x5ce4f3cab7795c09c884da51e693661810b11cc4a03d660c1a77a443d017de89

Evidence boundary: Mirror proves create, treasury mint, treasury burn, deleted serial metadata, and zero current supply. It does not prove a supplier payment, supplier-held authority, replay prevention, or atomic settlement. The supply key can mint another serial.

Sponsor integration status

Live evidence

Hedera x402 spike

Public transfer verified; canonical AP execution not yet proven.

Live evidence

Hedera HTS marker

Public lifecycle verified; not an invoice settlement.

Offline contract

World authority

Adapter and tests only. No live World authority is claimed.

Mirror checked 26 Jul 2026, 06:31:58 UTC · validation is fail closed

Synthetic control trace

Product storytelling fixture · not sponsor evidence

  1. step 01Scenario · RefusedpolicyScenario: INV-2026-0912 routes to review because its beneficiary differs from the supplier baseline.
  2. step 02Scenario · RefusedworldScenario: A2 would not add quorum because A1 and A2 share one backing class. The World adapter is offline.
  3. step 03Scenario · AllowedpolicyScenario: INV-2026-0916 is eligible under the illustrative standing mandate. No payment is initiated.
  4. step 04Scenario · RefusedpolicyScenario: INV-2026-0910 routes to review because no supplier payment baseline exists.
  5. step 05Scenario · RecordedprotocolDesign invariant: a changed beneficiary creates a different bare 64-hex canonical action digest.